King Arthur is a really undervalued adaptation that was tainted by Disney's need to make the story family-friendly.

There are two different movies inside King Arthur – one an epic big-budget blockbuster, the other a slick heist comedy – and one of them works way better than the other.

And so, for the historian of Dark Age Britain, King Arthur (2004) will go down easier than First Knight (1995). Fans of romantic spectacle will enjoy Camelot (1967).

The 2004 movie “King Arthur,” for example, made about $51 million at the U.S. box office against $120 million budget. Lack of success is a common theme among films based on the Arthurian legend.

While you might think you’ve heard/seen the King Arthur legend before, think again. There’s a new movie coming out with Sons of Anarchy star Charlie Hunnam in the titular role as the king of ...

King Arthur: Legend of the Sword isn't a movie as much as a feature length montage of bastardized lore and rejected Game of Thrones pitches.

‘King Arthur: Legend of the Sword’ — What the Critics Are Saying. The knives — or should that be swords? — are out for Guy Ritchie's new take on the classic tale.

Warner Bros. has moved Guy Ritchie’s untitled King Arthur movie to Presidents Day weekend, Friday, Feb. 17, 2017. Taking a seat at the round table will be Jude Law, ...

Movies bomb all the time. Still, the death this weekend of “King Arthur: Legend of the Sword” is one of those titanic doozies that will probably rewrite how blockbusters are made. Grossing a ...

Clive Owen reigns in King Arthur. The new Jerry Bruckheimer production, King Arthur, directed by Antoine Fuqua, claims to be the real (historical) deal. Arthur, it seems, was actually Lucius ...

The movie was meant to premiere in March 2020 at South By Southwest, but the festival was canceled, as was the subsequent release on May 29, 2020. This was due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which has ...