Supreme Court, Uinta Basin Rail

How the Supreme Court viewed Colorado’s challenge to a Utah oil railroad — and what could be next
With thousands of pages of briefs filed and two hours of oral argument completed on Tuesday, Chief Justice John Roberts of the U.S. Supreme Court declared the case known as Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v.
Supreme Court To Hear Argument on New US Rail Line
The dispute is over whether federal agencies should need to consider broad environmental risks when deciding to approve projects.
This Supreme Court Case Could Forever Change Environmental Reviews
The case of Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado could have huge climate and environmental implications.
Supreme Court is poised to weaken environmental review of infrastructure projects
The Supreme Court appeared poised Tuesday to significantly weaken the scope of environmental reviews of major infrastructure projects in a case that could hand President-elect Donald Trump an early win on an issue he often hammered on during his first term.
US Supreme Court May Limit Environmental Reviews in Utah Railway Fight
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court appeared inclined on Tuesday to limit the extent to which federal agencies must review the environmental impact of projects they regulate in a dispute over a proposed railway in Utah meant to carry crude oil that was challenged by environmental groups and a Colorado county.
US Supreme Court examines Utah railway in environmental review fight
The U.S. Supreme Court is set on Tuesday to examine the extent to which federal agencies must review the environmental impact of projects they regulate in a dispute over a proposed railway in Utah that was challenged by environmental groups and a Colorado county.
Supreme Court probes environmental review of Utah oil railway
The Supreme Court justices will weigh the fate of an 88-mile railroad project that would transport crude oil in Utah as they consider a dispute over whether federal officials conducted a stringent enough environmental review before approving it.
The U.S. Supreme Court heard a case about a Utah oil railroad. Here’s what the justices considered.
The U.S. Supreme Court appeared open to diminishing the scope of how federal agencies consider environmental impacts Tuesday in a case centered on a proposed oil railway in northeastern Utah. The 88-mile Uinta Basin Railway,
Supreme Court weighs limits on key federal environmental law
Justices on the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday appeared generally willing to strike a blow against a key federal environmental law in a case brought by Coloradans against a controversial Utah oil-train project — but they struggled to reach a consensus on exactly how to define the new limits they might impose on the law.
coloradopolitics2d
Colorado justices rule plaintiffs can use open records law for evidence when suing government
The Colorado Supreme Court decided on Monday that nothing in the state's open records law prevents a person from seeking ...
Justice Neil Gorsuch Recuses From Case That Could Benefit Colorado Billionaire
The justice had been under pressure to step aside from the matter because of his myriad ties to Philip Anschutz, an oil and ...
The Aspen Times17h
U.S. Supreme Court weighs limitations on federal environmental policy in Uinta Basin railway case
Amtrak's California Zephyr train passes through Byers Canyon, which the Colorado River cuts through. The Uinta Railway Basin ...
coloradopolitics13h
'Chutzpah': Colorado justices raise eyebrows at Weld County's assertion it can evade redistricting law
Members of the Colorado Supreme Court appeared incredulous on Wednesday as a lawyer for Weld County argued the jurisdiction did not need to follow the state's redistricting law, maintained it should ...