Earlier this term, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously decided that the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had made it too ...

Understanding how the U.S. went from marriage equality a decade ago to steep backsliding on transgender rights today could ...

The Trump administration’s focus on “reverse discrimination” against White people is not backed by data and reflects a political narrative of White grievance.

The U.S. Supreme Court, in an opinion authored by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, held that “reverse discrimination” cases should be reviewed under the same standard as minority-group ...

A Supreme Court ruling about discrimination claims was a win for the rule of law, not a judicial ideology, Bloomberg Opinion columnist Noah Feldman writes.

Supreme Court’s Ruling Against Reverse Discrimination Strikes a Blow for Fairness in Hiring, Promotions High court levels the legal playing field, saying that everyone deserves the same protection ...

It will now be easier for employees to file reverse discrimination lawsuits. Wang added, “But that’s not consistent with the statute that tells us that we’re supposed to protect all ...

White individuals and straight people do not need to meet a higher burden of proof than members of minority groups to prevail in employment discrimination suits, the Supreme Court held Thursday ...

White individuals and straight people do not need to meet a higher burden of proof than members of minority groups to prevail in employment discrimination suits, the Supreme Court held June 5. The ...

While it may now be more difficult for employers in certain jurisdictions to secure early dismissal of “reverse discrimination” claims, it does not change the ultimate burden of proof.

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the nation’s anti-discrimination laws apply equally to all employees, regardless of whether those complaining of bias are white or Black, gay or ...